What can you really see in seismic?

Module 07  ·  Tuning in map view

Does bright mean thick — or does it mean gas?

A minibasin sand, thinning updip as it laps onto the flank of a salt dome. Extract the amplitude and a bright rim appears around the dome. That rim is the oldest question in amplitude interpretation: is it hydrocarbon, or is it the bed passing through tuning thickness on its way to pinching out? Both produce a bright rim. The two are distinguished by what the rim follows.

Why a bright rim appears at all

The sand is thickest out in the basin and thins to nothing against the dome. Somewhere on that flank it passes through tuning thickness, where the reflections from its top and base line up and reinforce. That happens at one particular thickness, and because thickness is laid out in rings around the dome, the bright spot is a ring.

The rock and the fluid are the same all the way round the dome. The rim is an interference effect.

Why a fluid effect looks the same

Hydrocarbon in the same sand would also brighten it, and it would also collect updip near the dome. Two different causes, one bright rim.

The test is what the bright edge follows. A fluid sits below a contact, so its limit follows a structural contour: a line of constant depth, and it is flat. Tuning follows a thickness contour. With regional dip on the section those two are no longer the same line, and the map shape separates them.

The sand

The structure

With no regional dip the structure is a perfect dome and the two rims coincide, which is exactly the case you cannot resolve. Add dip and they separate.

The fluid

The data

Three maps of the same sand

Click any map to move the crosshair and the section line

1 Thickness rings around the dome

2 Structure depth to the top of the sand

3 Amplitude what you would be handed

4 Section through the dome flank the wedge you are really looking at

5 The tuning curve behind it

Wavelength λ = V / f— m
Tuning thickness— m
Where the sand tunes—
At the crosshair: thickness— m
At the crosshair: depth— m
At the crosshair: fluid—
At the crosshair: amplitude—
So is the bright rim a fluid or is it tuning?—

Try this — and what to watch for

  1. Look at the three maps before touching anything. The point: the amplitude map on its own supports the wrong conclusion. There is no hydrocarbon anywhere in the model — the sand is full of water from edge to edge — and no lines have been drawn on it yet. There is still a bright rim around the dome on the amplitude map. Check the bar beneath it: that really is the loud end of the scale. If you had been handed only this map, the rim would look like the most promising thing on it, and it is a thickness effect and nothing else.
  2. Check where the rim sits. The point: it proves the rim is thickness, not fluid, before any gas exists in the model. Turn on the tuning ring and compare it with the bright rim. They are the same line. The rim traces the contour where the sand passes through tuning thickness, which is a thickness contour, so it closes in a ring around the dome regardless of which way the structure dips.
  3. Now put gas in it. The point: now there are two bright things on one map, and you have to tell them apart. Switch to gas updip and watch panel 3 change. A second bright area appears, and this one is cut off along a straight edge — the fluid contact. Because there is regional dip, that edge runs across the thickness rings rather than following them.
  4. Learn the test. The point: this is the check behind the phrase "conformable to structure", and it is the most useful thing on this page. Compare the shape of the bright rim with panel 1 and then with panel 2. Tuning follows a thickness contour. A fluid follows a structural contour and stops at a flat, level edge — the flat spot. When somebody says an amplitude anomaly is "conformable to structure", this is the check they have done.
  5. Take the dip out. The point: it shows you the case the map genuinely cannot settle, so you know when to stop arguing and go and get more data. Set regional dip to zero with gas still in. The structure is now a perfect dome, so structural and thickness contours are both circles and the two effects become indistinguishable on the map. This is the genuinely hard case, and it is why the check needs dip, well control, or an independent attribute rather than the amplitude map alone.
  6. Move tuning instead. The point: it is a real test you can run on real data by reprocessing at a different bandwidth. Back to brine, and sweep frequency from 12 Hz to 50 Hz. The bright ring migrates up the flank as tuning thickness falls. A fluid contact would not move an inch, because it is set by the rocks and the pressure regime, not by your bandwidth. Reprocessing at a different bandwidth and watching whether an anomaly moves is a genuinely useful test.
  7. Thin the sand until the whole thing tunes. The point: it is the one regime where reading amplitude as thickness is defensible. Take the basinal thickness below the tuning value. Now the ring stops being a ring: the entire sand is below tuning, so amplitude rises steadily with thickness everywhere and the map looks like a thickness map. That is the one regime where reading amplitude as thickness is safe, and you have to establish you are in it rather than assume it.

If you remember nothing else

  • A bright rim around a dome is what tuning looks like in map view. Beds thinning onto a high must pass through tuning thickness on their way out, and that contour closes as a ring.
  • Fluid effects follow structure; tuning follows thickness. If those two are not parallel, the map shape distinguishes them.
  • A fluid limit is flat and it is level. A tuning limit is not — it tracks whatever shape the thickness happens to have.
  • Tuning moves when your bandwidth changes. Contacts do not.
  • Below tuning, amplitude tracks thickness, and only there is a thickness map from amplitude defensible.
Method, assumptions, and where to read more

The sand pinches out against the salt at a fixed radius and thickens outward into the basin over the taper distance you set. The top of the sand is a regional dip plus a smooth dome uplift, so structural contours and thickness contours are deliberately not parallel. At every map cell the thickness becomes a two-way time with the sand velocity, and the response is the top and base reflection coefficients convolved with a zero-phase Ricker wavelet. Amplitude is the extremum matching the sign of the top reflection, which is what a horizon-based extraction picks up. That is the wedge of module 02 evaluated cell by cell, which is all a tuning artifact ever is.

Brine sand is taken as slightly softer than the surrounding shale and gas sand as considerably softer, which is the usual Gulf of Mexico case and gives the familiar bright soft-top response. The contact is treated as a horizontal surface, so gas is present wherever the top of the sand is shallower than the contact and the sand is present at all.

Left out, and every one of them makes the real problem harder: amplitude variation with offset, which is the attribute that actually resolves this question in practice; lateral change in the sand and in the overburden; velocity pull-up beneath the dome; imaging problems on a steep salt flank, which are severe; residual gas, which brightens almost as well as commercial gas; and any noise at all. The color maps are perceptually uniform and safe for color-vision deficiency, deliberately, because rainbow scales invent edges in amplitude maps that the data does not contain.

Next up — the last one

08 · Am I picking the top of the sand, or near it?

Every module so far has assumed the peak of an event sits exactly on the boundary that produced it. The last one removes that assumption, rotates the wavelet, and follows the horizon as it moves away from the boundary while its shape stays unchanged.

Open module 08 → All modules
← Resolution in map view Next: phase, polarity & well ties →